To the extent possible under law, the author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to Digital Painting, a complete survey (text only).
Covers the major aspects of digital painting, written for artists, art students, art historians, galleries, curators, collectors and art lovers. For a brief overview, follow the link to: DIGITAL PAINTING, a brief overview
Updated since 2013. Last revision November 28, 2018
This website draws on the experience of
a handful of pioneering digital painters. The information you find
here is independent, revenue-free, regularly updated, and offered
without cookies. The text has been dedicated into the Public Domain
by a CC0 1.0 universal license. You are free to copy, print and use
it in any way you like. Only
the images are protected by copyright.
Share the effort to promote a better understanding of digital painting!
Differences in procedure
Uniqueness and limited editions
Digital painting and photography
Size, resolution, enlargement
Vector and raster painting enlargement
Quality-quantity convention, limited editions
Collecting digital art, assessment
Market for digital art
A 'digital' painting is created on the computer using a graphics program, a virtual paintbox with brushes, colors and other supplies. The definition applies to a painting on its primary digital carrier (as a computer file) as well as when it is transferred in a non-manual process to a secondary physical carrier (printed on paper, acryllic glass, aluminum, canvas, etc).
Apart from the traditional painting utensils, the virtual painting
box contains instruments that don't exist outside the computer. The
use of these instruments distinguish a digital from a non-digital
painting. Typical visual characteristics can be traced back to the
power of the computer to attach geometrical formulas to lines, shapes
and forms. While it is impossible for a human hand to create exactly
identical forms, or construct a perfect circle or a perfectly straight
line, for a computer it is difficult to do anything but this.
Formula-based shapes are easy to recognize by a degree of perfection
that is literally inhuman. They bear some resemblance to traditional
paper cut-outs or stencil art. Specific traits of digital painting
- Sharp, bold appearance
- Regular distortion
- Exact repetition
- Perfect circles, squares and other shapes
- Embossing and other 3D illusion
- Perfectly smooth gradients
- 100% monochrome color planes
The flatness of the physical representation is also typical for the digital medium. Though the computer can be used to create a convincing illusion of texture on the virtual canvas, as yet this cannot be translated to real texture on paper, dibond, perspex etc.
In most programs it is possible to undo all or at least a generous number of brush strokes and other actions without a trace. Compared to traditional painting, where one wrong move can spoil the painting, the ‘undo’ feature allows a more spontaneous and intuitive method. Instant 'push button' transformations also make for quickness and spontaneity. On the other hand, one mainstream form of digital painting (vector painting) involves the manipulation of digital shapes with a specific tool, and this is a slower and more deliberate method than stroke by stroke painting.
When the digital artist is done, the painting is on the hard disk of a computer. In order to sell it, it will have to be transferred to a physical carrier like dibond, fine art paper, acryllic glass, etc. What happens to the primary digital carrier depends on how the artist wants to offer the painting. If the print is sold as an original, the digital carrier is either deleted or transferred to the buyer. If it is offered as a series, the artist deletes the digital carrier when the prefixed number of copies is sold. For an open ended series, the digital carrier remains on the hard disk of the computer. The buyer should always be informed about the status of the digital carrier.
Obviously, forms and shapes that are typical for digital painting cannot be transmitted to a physical carrier in a manual process. All the digital characteristics would be lost. The implication is often under-emphasized: a digital artwork, in its physical representation, is and can only be a print. If an artwork that was created on a computer is printed on a physical carrier and, as is often the case, painted over with real paint, the result is a 'traditional painting'. The original work on the computer still meets the definition of a 'digital painting'.
The absence of texture makes prints vulnerable for duplication by way
of photography. The digital carrier is an added risk. However, there
are several effective ways to protect against duplication and it is a
common misunderstanding that a print can't be a numerously unique work
of art. It certainly can and often is.
A certificate and a manual signature on the print are a common way to protect the painting. Registration at a trusted third party is at the time of writing only possible for prints on paper (at Hahnemühle). Online galleries offer protection by keeping artworks online with the message 'sold' once the painting is sold or the edition closed.
The artist can also embed a unique mark or hologram in the print and the certificate. Security holograms such as are used in banknotes, passports and credit cards are another advanced option.
As to the digital carrier, the artist should carefully protect the full-size, high resolution file of the artwork by choosing safe methods of transfer and only share files with a professional printing company that deletes the files after the production is completed. The artist should display (and upload) artwork to the web in the lowest resolution and the smallest size possible for a good representation.
Based on differences in method and appearance, four mainstream
directions can be recognized.
1. Computer generated painting: Characteristics of digital painting are present. The resolution is optimal (the highest printable) and size is flexible (the largest printable).
2. Raster painting: Characteristics of digital painting are absent. Resolution and size are fixed.
3. Vector painting: Characteristics of digital painting are present. The resolution is optimal (the highest printable) and the size is flexible (the largest printable).
4. Vector-raster painting: Characteristics of digital painting are present. Resolution and size are fixed.
Computer generated painting
Both in procedure and in appearance a raster, grid, or bitmap painting resembles most closely a traditional painting with real brushes and paint. The image is created on the screen in a spontaneous, stroke by stroke manner by hand or with a stylo. Colors and lines are registered pixel by pixel on the digital canvas. Every characteristic of the individual painter's hand is preserved.
A main disadvantage is the fixed resolution. Often, the length and width of the creation is as small as a (mobile) computer screen and the resolution as low as 72 dots per inch. If the image is to be transferred to a physical carrier of customary size, it will have to be enlarged considerably. Enlargement generally entails manual correction, a tedious and time consuming process which seriously hampers the printing of raster and hybrid paintings.
This lagging-behind is gradually caught up by the introduction of 'scripting', which allows the painter to enlarge the resolution and size of the painting in an automated process of replay. (see 'size, resolution, enlargement').
A vector painting is made by choosing basic shapes like circles, triangles and squares, or by painting them freehand, and then transforming them with special tools. The mathematical basis of these shapes are 'Bezier curves', named after a French engineer who developed them in 1962 for the automobile design at Renault. The painting process is somewhat like sculpture and less suitable for intuitive, spontaneous work than raster. All lines and shapes are captured into geometrical formulas. They obey to one-click operations such as change color, make transparent, emboss, flip, group, cast shadow, etc. The formula based method leaves no room for characteristics of the individual painter's hand. The personality of the maker can still be felt in aspects like the choice of subject, composition, palette and gradients, atmosphere, concept of a painting etc. - but not in the brush stroke.
Vector paintings have the advantage that files are small and can easily be enlarged to any size (within a vector program) without loss of sharpness. The resolution is flexible and can always be set to the maximum that the printer can handle.
Hybrid vector-raster painting combines the personal brush style of raster with the formula-based lines and forms of vector. It is done in one program or by combining different programs for vector and raster painting. The raster elements lose sharpness when they are enlarged and need manual correction. Some hybrid painting programs (e.g. ArtRage) use Bezier curves in the background to smooth all lines and curves without intervention of the artist. The painting procedure is spontaneous, stroke by stroke, and the output is a fixed resolution raster file. The smooth, non-raster, non-vector appearance of the painting reflects the hybrid basis. Smoothing mitigates the loss of resolution when the image is enlarged. In addition, the recently introduced option of ‘scripting’ allows the painter to automatically enlarge the resolution and size of the painting.
Over the centuries, artists have used a variety of tools to put the outside world on their canvas as raw material to be digested and molded into their own subjective interpretation. It is nothing new that painters use a camera. Still, the digital process does make a difference. To place existing images on a digital canvas and translate them into paintings now requires nothing but a push on a button. It brings subtle changes in painterly development (see below) and boundaries between disciplines. A photographer now uses the same software for editing and transforming a photo as the artist for creating a painting. At the same time, digital painters start to use the flat physical carriers that were developed for photography. The shared toolbox establishes a transition zone between photography and painting. Essentially this is a transition zone between the recording and the creation of images. Classification is not always easy if a photo is used as input in a genuinely creative process (as opposed to push-button transformations). If photographic aspects dominate it is usually classified as 'digital photo art' or 'new photography'. If painterly aspects dominate as a ‘digital painting’.
When the artist increases the height and width of an existing image, its resolution - or information density - decreases and it will become vague. Resolution is usually expressed in 'dpi' (dots per inch). While the image on the screen already looks sharp at the standard resolution of 72 dpi on the web, a physical carrier needs 300 dpi or more. In addition, the physical carrier is often much larger in height and width as well.
For a vector painting, where colors and lines are controlled by
formulas, enlargement requires nothing but a push on a button. There
is never a loss of resolution. For raster painting, information will
have to be added to fill in the gaps. Usually this is done with the
help of enlargement software or simply by the 're-size' option in the
Although much progress has been made, it remains difficult to fill in the empty space between handmade lines and shapes. Lines become unsteady and crumbly and unintended 'noise' appears along the edges of color patches. The image above shows two different types of online enlargement of the same fragment of Pierre Bonnard's Getting out of the bath. Note that each method entails its own noise and deformation.
In order to eliminate deformation, automatic enlargement is usually followed by manual correction. This is not something to go about lightly. Depending on the speed of the computer and the chosen size and resolution of the image, correction can be slow or even come to a halt. The screen, of course, is not enlarged: the artist can no longer see the whole image and will have to zoom in and out frequently, switching between corrections and reviewing the results.
Recently, painting software has introduced ‘scripting’: all strokes and actions are recorded and can later be repeated with higher resolution on a larger digital canvas on the desktop. Scripting is an important development: by making the resolution flexible it clears the backlog for raster painters and reduces the advance of vector painting when it comes to printing.
What can be done to see and to represent colors reliably? Let's look
look at different purposes in the digital environment:
To see colors
Every computer screen deviates to some degree from the 'true' color values that is set as a standard by the international color convention (ICC). These deviations are corrected by a calibration of the screen. For anyone working with colors it is absolutely necessary to regularly calibrate. This is done with the help of a small device that is attached to the screen. It calls up a number of colors, compares them with the standard and creates a monitor profile. This unique piece of software corrects the screen of the individual computer and is automatically installed as the default. It runs silently in the background. Its only task is to correct the monitor. Although, confusingly, this monitor profile is listed between a whole range of optional profiles, apart from a regular update it should be left alone. It is never embedded in an artwork.
To create colors
In professional desktop painting software, the basic profile types have their corresponding palettes and matching color spectrum in the workspace. It is advisable to work in the palette and the spectrum that matches the destination - CYMK for printing, RGB for online display and grayscale for black and white.
To display and print colors
The artist should embed a color profile in the finished artwork that matches one of two destinations: a webpage or a printing company. This is important because the color palette for printing is much smaller than the average palette of a computer screen. If the artist sends a painting to the pinter that has the RGB profile for online display embedded, the printer or his machines will have to translate many colors that are not available to some nearest neighbour. The result can be a costly disappointment.
This is especially relevant for mobile apps because they have the RGB profile standard embedded in the artworks. If the work is to be printed, colors should be converted to a CYMK printing profile. This is done in a desktop painting program. As a rule the printing company prescribes the artist one of the CYMK profiles that are available in most computers, or he supplies his own profile that is tailored to his machinery, ink, choice of paper etc. Some printing companies accept files with the RGB profile and convert them to their own CYMK profile.
Colors in browsers
Most of the colors we see on the screen are interpretations by browsers and apps. Only a hard core of 216 colors is standardized between browsers. The artist who aims to avoid online color deviation entirely has the option to use the 'web safe color palette'. This seriously limits the choice of colors. Even then, differences seem to occur
In conclusion, three things are needed to see and to represent colors
(1) If you are using a desktop computer your screen should be calibrated.
(2) The artist should work in the color palette that matches the destination
(3) When finished, a color profile should be embedded in the artwork that matches the destination (either a digital destination of a printing company).
Over the centuries art lovers have felt the hand and mood of the painter in brush strokes and paint. Many find that a painting without texture is fine in a book, but doesn't feel right on the wall. Though a stylus can be as sensitive to the pressure of the hand as a traditional brush, and the pressure can be made visible on the screen, a digital painting is entirely flat. Many painters share the feelings of art lovers. Some project their work on a physical carrier and paint it over, using the computer as a preparatory device and sacrificing the digital characteristics. Others apply brushstroke gel to the physical carrier. Here too, the result is a traditional painting. By contrast, yet others have chosen to accept flatness as a necessary property of digital painting at this stage. Some emphasize it in appreciation of the minimalistic appearance.
In traditional painting, the numbering of a limited edition by
convention follows a quality/quantity notation 'i/n' in front of the
artwork. Where 'i' indicates a rough ranking of the individual print
according to technical and aesthetic quality and 'n' is the size of
the edition. Since all prints of a digital artwork are identical, 'i'
has no other meaning than to let a buyer know how many prints are
still available. The meaning of 'n' is still the same: the size of a
limited edition has economic significance for collectors. As in
traditional painting, the size of 'n' is set by the artist prior to
the first sale. The artist keeps register of the number of copies that
are sold. Open series are referred to as '∞ ', and numerically unique
prints as '1/1'. In the automated printing process, the unnumbered
run-up prints that are traditionally labeled as 'E.A.' (epreuve
artiste) or 'A.P.' (artist's proof), can still occur.
A great variety of tools give the digital artist exciting new
opportunities to express thoughts and feelings. On the negative side,
the more the computer facilitates the work of the artist by offering
easy imports, taking over painting processes and offering, sometimes
even imposing, a wide array of styles, the more difficult it becomes
for painters to develop their own idiom, to take distance from images
that are already there, and to make the voice of the computer
secondary to their own.
Painting software has a decisive influence on the style of any artist. A change of program inevitably makes for a change in style. Once a considered choice has been made, the artist should only change it with good reason.
It has become apparent that it has advantages to use software from established companies with large artist communities. Such companies are more likely not only adapt their software to new hardware but also offer backward integration. Without this, paintings may get caught in a version of an app that is tied to older hardware, with no possibility to get them out or print them larger than a stamp. Many raster painters experienced the loss of years of work that became trapped in Brushes, a small open source program and one of the most popular painting apps ever. Naturally, artists develop their own style in an ongoing process of interaction with the software, so when the software has to be discontinued, this investment too will be lost.
Collecting starts with looking. Unfortunately, browsing the huge
amount of online portfolios is not as easy and pleasant as it could
be. There is a great deal of room for improvement in search
algorithms. At some of the worlds largest online galleries, collectors
are flooded by very similar computer generated images that are made by
only a few painters. If they tire from so much homogeneity and decide
to resume another time, they will have to wade through these images
again. Some galleries lower the resolution as well as the size of
images to speed up browsing, thereby depriving collectors of the far
more time-efficient possibility to judge paintings at first sight. And
not withstanding the major visual differences of the mainstream
painting directions, many search engines do not allow to filter on
‘raster’, ‘vector’, ‘hybrid’ or ‘computer generated’ digital art.
Primary aspects like resolution or the number of prints of a limited
edition that is still available are often not mentioned in the
The used software is also rarely mentioned. In order to appreciate originality and technical skill, collectors need to know which program the artist has used to create the painting. Without this, it is impossible to distinguish what comes out of the app from what comes out of the artist. (Visit Ben Guerette's A Blog appArt for a wild variety of styles and technical skills that are a property of the software.)
Although many online galleries offer reliable visual information about the resolution with a online 1:1 detail of an artwork, the look and feel of the painting on its carrier cannot be assessed online. Colors to some extent vary with the carrier and the type of screen, so they too remain difficult, even if the collector’s screen is calibrated.
The best way to judge a digital painting is to ask the artist for a
miniature sample. It should be printed on the chosen carrier and
executed with the same resolution. This is an easy and inexpensive way
to get the information that is needed to make a sound decision.
As is true for traditional painting, it is always important to buy at a trusted party. While most digital painters are still alive, paintings can be bought directly from the artist or at the online galleries where they show their portfolios.
The market for digital art is gradually maturing. Collectors start to
realize that digital painting is a new visual language that can't be
expressed with traditional means. Many problems have been solved.
Color representation has become fairly reliable, thanks to the use of
color profiles and calibration. Technical measures and a responsible
handling of digital files have brought the risk of duplication down to
an acceptable level. Slowly but steadily, digital paintings are
finding their way to museums, auctions and galleries where they meet a
new generation of collectors.
Yet, many highly professional, even pioneering digital painters still have no idea how to get their work out of the computer and up on a wall. Most rely on an online gallery to offer prints of their work. Large online galleries offer an abundance of originals and quality prints worldwide with good sales conditions. Although this relieves artists of a host of technical concerns, there are also some serious disadvantages. If the printing is left to the gallery and the print sent directly to the collector, the artist can no longer evaluate and if necessary adjust the (color) representation. Signing the print by hand is likewise not possible. The computer of the artist is also no longer the only location where a high resolution file of the painting is stored.
A certificate bears a mark of identity such as the signature of the artist or a personalized sign, watermark, fingerprint or hologram which matches an identity mark on (or in) the artwork. The document contains a copyright declaration, distinguishes between an original and an open or closed edition, states the size of a limited edition, binds the artist to deletion of the digital carrier after the sale, and conditions the display of the artwork after it is sold. A Certificate of Unicity for a numerically unique print ('original' or '1/1') a Certificate for a Limited Edition and a Certificate for an Open Edition is regularly updated and freely available on this site.
Brushstroke gel: Water-soluble acrylic polymer
containing a UV inhibitor which helps protect the art from yellowing
and fading. Also used to recreate brushstrokes on digital paintings
printed on canvas. http://www.artandframingsolutions.com/BrushstrokeGel.htm
Don Archers blog, Digital art, artists and commentaries
Spyder calibration sensor
Carriers for digital painting:
Xpozer, Prints on polyester coated paper, floating, unframed mount (sRGB profile accepted)
Whitewall, Prints on Hahnemuele paper, canvas, brushed aluminum, dibond, perspex, (printer's color profile supplied, sRGB profile eccepted)
Drukwerkdeal, Postcards, large format prints on dibond and brushed aluminum, and postcards (printer's color profile supplied)
Certificates, For original, limited and open edition
Automatic conversion, photos to paintings, drawings and cartoons
Waterlogue, Automatic conversion of photos to paintings, drawings and cartoons
Many programs listed
Oneone perfect resize, (enlargement correction)
ZoomPro5, Ben Vista
Artograph,Tracer for manual enlargement of a small physical carrier, on a wall, canvas etc.
Overwiew of vector programs and file formats
Fractal art, video1
Fractal art, video2
Agora West 25th Street, New York, NY)
K16 Keizersgracht 16, 1015 CP Amsterdam, NL)
Hand painted copies:
Dafen Village, China: By artist, style, size
MOCA Museum of Computer Art (MOCA) of New York State University offers emerging directions in digital art an online platform since 1993. Annual competition in digital art, catalogues.
Programs for animation painting:
Pencil Traditional hand drawn 2D animation
Blender (open source)
Animation street (for iPad)
Animation Studio (for iPad)
Animation desk (for iPad en iPhone)
Animation desk (for iPad en iPhone)
Programs for painting on iPad and iPhone:
Adobe Eazel (raster)
Adobe ideas (vector)(in combination with Adobe Illustrator)
Programs for painting on PC and Mac:
Adobe Photoshop CS6
Programs for fractal painting:
Programs for vector painting:
Adobe ideas (iPad) (in combination with Adobe Illustrator)
Inkpad (iPad/iPhone) by Steve Sprang (open source)
CorelDraw for Windows
For artwork on paper
A Blog appArt, An overview of styles and features of apps and painting software by Ben Guerette
vector art, video
Blood sweat vector
Vectorization, online (raster to vector conversion):
Watermark, digimark, hologram:
A personalized watermark can be embedded in Photoshop
2013-2018 DigitalPainting.be Amsterdam - Gent
2018/11/28 The text is corrected and
2018/03/13 The text is dedicated into the Public Domain
2017/09/13 New certificates published (version 5.0)
2017/08/30 Update of 'characteristics'; 'uniqueness and limited editions'; 'links'
2017/08/22 Update of 'detailed survey'
2017/08/14 Update of 'brief overview'
2015/08/08 New certificates: (v.4 for originals, v.1 for editions)
2015/08/06 Major update 'Market for digital art'
2015/08/03 'About color'
2015/05/21 'File formats'
2015/05/01 'Pioneering digital artists'
2015/04/25 'Visual characteristics'